280E Accounting Explained (With Examples)
280E Tax Liability Calculator
Cannabis Business Tax Impact Analysis
Section 280E Impact: Cannabis businesses cannot deduct ordinary business expenses due to federal tax code 280E. This calculator helps estimate your additional tax burden.
Your 280E Tax Impact
Understanding the Basics of Section 280E
Section 280E of the Internal Revenue Code represents one of the most significant financial challenges facing cannabis businesses today. Enacted in 1982 as part of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act, this provision prohibits businesses trafficking in controlled substances from deducting ordinary business expenses when calculating federal taxable income. While originally intended to prevent drug dealers from claiming tax deductions, 280E now applies to state-legal cannabis businesses, creating a unique and often devastating tax burden that can push effective tax rates above 70%.
The statute specifically states: "No deduction or credit shall be allowed for any amount paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business if such trade or business (or the activities which comprise such trade or business) consists of trafficking in controlled substances." Since cannabis remains a Schedule I controlled substance at the federal level, all plant-touching cannabis businesses fall under this restriction, regardless of state legalization status.
Cost of Goods Sold: The Critical Exception
While 280E prohibits the deduction of ordinary business expenses, it does allow businesses to reduce their gross income by properly calculated Cost of Goods Sold (COGS). This distinction between deductions and COGS adjustments becomes crucial for cannabis business survival. COGS represents the direct costs attributable to producing goods sold by a company, and these costs can still be subtracted from gross receipts to determine gross income.
Understanding what qualifies as COGS versus ordinary business expenses requires careful analysis. Generally, COGS includes direct materials, direct labor, and overhead costs directly related to production. For cannabis businesses, this might include seeds, growing medium, nutrients, direct cultivation labor, and the portion of facility costs directly attributable to cultivation areas. However, costs related to selling, marketing, or general administration cannot be included in COGS under 280E.
The calculation method for COGS also matters significantly. Cannabis businesses must choose between different inventory costing methods, with many opting for the Section 471-11 regulations, which provide more flexibility in allocating certain indirect costs to COGS. This choice can substantially impact the total COGS calculation and, consequently, the business's taxable income.
Real-World Example: Dispensary Operations
Consider a cannabis dispensary with the following annual figures:
Gross Revenue: $2,000,000
Product Purchases (COGS): $800,000
Rent: $120,000
Salaries (non-production): $300,000
Marketing: $80,000
Utilities: $40,000
Security: $60,000
Insurance: $50,000
Other Operating Expenses: $100,000
Under normal tax rules, this dispensary would calculate taxable income as: $2,000,000 - $800,000 - $650,000 (total operating expenses) = $550,000. With a 21% federal corporate tax rate, they would owe $115,500 in federal taxes.
However, under 280E, only COGS can be deducted. Therefore, taxable income becomes: $2,000,000 - $800,000 = $1,200,000. At the same 21% rate, federal taxes jump to $252,000. This represents an additional $136,500 in federal taxes solely due to 280E, effectively creating a 42% tax rate on actual profit rather than the standard 21%.
This example illustrates why many cannabis businesses struggle with profitability despite strong revenues. The inability to deduct ordinary business expenses means that businesses may owe taxes even when operating at a loss after accounting for all actual expenses.
Cultivation Facility COGS Allocation
For cultivation facilities, the COGS calculation becomes more complex but potentially more favorable. These businesses can often allocate a larger portion of their expenses to COGS through careful accounting practices. Consider a cultivation operation with these annual figures:
Gross Revenue: $3,000,000
Direct Materials (seeds, nutrients, growing medium): $400,000
Direct Labor (cultivation staff): $500,000
Facility Rent: $240,000
Utilities: $180,000
Security: $100,000
Administrative Salaries: $200,000
Marketing and Sales: $150,000
Equipment Depreciation: $120,000
A cultivation facility might successfully argue that portions of rent, utilities, and security directly related to the cultivation space qualify as COGS. If 70% of the facility is dedicated to cultivation, they might include:
Direct Materials: $400,000
Direct Labor: $500,000
Facility Rent (70%): $168,000
Utilities (70%): $126,000
Security (70%): $70,000
Equipment Depreciation (cultivation-related): $84,000
Total COGS: $1,348,000
This strategic allocation reduces taxable income from $3,000,000 to $1,652,000, compared to only deducting direct materials and labor, which would result in taxable income of $2,100,000. The difference in federal tax liability between these two approaches would be approximately $94,000 annually.
Manufacturing and Processing Considerations
Cannabis manufacturers and processors often have the most flexibility in maximizing COGS under 280E. These businesses transform raw cannabis into finished products like edibles, concentrates, or topicals, allowing them to include various production-related costs in their COGS calculation.
A cannabis manufacturer might include:
Raw cannabis material costs
Direct labor for production workers
Packaging materials
Quality testing required for production
Production facility rent and utilities
Production equipment depreciation
Production supplies and materials
For example, an edibles manufacturer with $5,000,000 in revenue might successfully allocate $3,500,000 to COGS through careful accounting, compared to a dispensary with similar revenue that might only achieve $2,000,000 in COGS. This difference of $1,500,000 in deductible costs translates to $315,000 in federal tax savings.
Strategic Business Structure Responses
Many cannabis businesses have developed creative strategies to minimize 280E impact through careful business structuring. One common approach involves separating non-plant-touching activities into separate entities. For instance, a business might create one entity that handles cannabis operations and another that provides management services, real estate, or intellectual property licensing to the cannabis entity.
Under this structure, the non-cannabis entity can deduct ordinary business expenses normally, while charging the cannabis entity for services. These service charges become COGS for the cannabis entity if properly structured. However, the IRS scrutinizes these arrangements carefully, and businesses must ensure legitimate business purposes and arm's-length pricing.
Another strategy involves vertical integration, where businesses control multiple stages of production. By bringing cultivation, processing, and retail under common ownership, businesses can potentially maximize COGS at each stage while maintaining better control over transfer pricing between entities.
Compliance and Documentation Requirements
Proper 280E compliance requires meticulous record-keeping and documentation. Cannabis businesses must maintain detailed records that clearly distinguish between COGS and ordinary business expenses. This includes:
Time tracking systems that separate employees' production activities from selling or administrative tasks. For example, if a budtender spends 30% of their time packaging products and 70% serving customers, only 30% of their wages might qualify for COGS inclusion.
Facility allocation documentation showing what percentage of space is used for production versus retail or administrative purposes. This might involve detailed floor plans, square footage calculations, and usage logs.
Detailed inventory tracking systems that comply with both state regulations and federal tax requirements. These systems must track product from seed to sale while maintaining the documentation necessary to support COGS calculations.
State Tax Implications and Considerations
While 280E is a federal provision, its impact ripples through to state tax obligations. Some states have "decoupled" from 280E, allowing cannabis businesses to deduct ordinary business expenses for state tax purposes. California, Colorado, and Oregon are among states that have taken this approach, providing some relief to cannabis operators.
However, even in states that have decoupled from 280E, the federal tax burden remains substantial. Additionally, cannabis businesses often face additional state and local taxes specific to cannabis, including excise taxes, cultivation taxes, and special sales taxes that can range from 10% to 37% of retail prices.
Looking Forward: Potential Changes and Industry Impact
The cannabis industry continues to advocate for 280E reform through various channels. Proposed solutions include federal legalization, rescheduling cannabis to Schedule III or below (which would exempt it from 280E), or specific legislative fixes to exempt state-legal cannabis businesses from 280E application.
The SAFE Banking Act and other federal legislation could provide incremental relief, though they don't directly address 280E. Some tax practitioners argue that recent tax court cases have begun to provide more clarity on acceptable COGS allocations, potentially offering businesses more flexibility in their calculations.
Conclusion
Section 280E remains a fundamental challenge for cannabis businesses, often determining the difference between profitability and failure. Understanding the nuances of COGS calculation, maintaining meticulous records, and implementing strategic business structures are essential for navigating this complex landscape. While the industry awaits federal reform, businesses must work within existing constraints, leveraging every legitimate opportunity to minimize their 280E burden while maintaining full compliance with federal tax law.
Cannabis operators should work closely with experienced tax professionals who understand both the technical requirements of 280E and the practical realities of cannabis operations. As the industry evolves and potentially moves toward federal legalization, businesses that have maintained strong accounting practices and compliance standards will be best positioned to thrive in a post-280E environment. Until then, understanding and properly managing 280E implications remains critical for any cannabis business's financial success and long-term sustainability.
Need Help Collecting Payments?
Cannabis businesses wait 45-60 days on average for B2B payments.
We'll get you paid faster.
